Blood Pressure, Congestion and Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Among Patients with and Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. A Cluster Analysis Approach from the Observational Registry DICUMAP.

INTRODUCTION: The association of patients with heart failure (HF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is strong and related additionally to blood pressure (BP). AIMS: To analyze distinctive clinical profiles among patients with HFpEF both with and without T2DM. METHODS: The study was based on a Spanish National Registry (multicenter and prospective) of patients with HF (DICUMAP), that enrolled outpatients with HF who underwent an ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and then were followed-up for 1 year. We categorized patients according to the presence/absence of T2DM then building different clusters based on K-medoids algorithm. RESULTS: 103 patients were included. T2DM was present in 44.7%. The patients with T2DM were grouped into two clusters and those without T2DM into three. All patients with T2DM had kidney disease and anemia. Among them, cluster 2 had higher systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure (PP) with a bad outcome (p = 0.03) regarding HF mortality and readmissions, influenced by eGFR (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.97-0.87, p = 0.04), and hemoglobin (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.71-0.63, p = 0.03). Among those without T2DM, cluster 3 had a pathological ABPM pattern with the highest PP, cluster 4 was slightly similar to cluster 2, and cluster 5 expressed a more benign pattern without differences on both, HF mortality and readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HFpEF and T2DM expressed two different profiles depending on neurohormonal activation and arterial stiffness with prognostic implications. Patients without T2DM showed three profiles depending on ABPM pattern, kidney disease and PP without prognostic repercussion.

La insuficiencia cardiaca con fracción de eyección en rango intermedio ¿es similar a la de fracción de eyección preservada? A favor / Is heart failure with midrange ejection fraction similar to preserved ejection fraction? For

La clasificación de la insuficiencia cardiaca (IC) basada en los valores ecocardiográficos de la fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo (FEVI) ha sido útil para definir 2 subtipos de IC: con FEVI reducida y con FEVI preservada. Recientemente se ha definido una nueva categoría, denominada IC con FEVI en rango medio (40-49%), que teniendo en cuenta la información disponible hasta el momento, posee más similitudes con la IC y FEVI preservada que reducida. No obstante, la evidencia aún es limitada para que la conclusión sea definitiva (AU)

Basing heart failure (HF) classification on the echocardiographic values of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has been useful in defining two sub-types of HF: HF with reduced LVEF and HF with preserved LVEF. A new category has recently been defined: HF with midrange LVEF (40-49%). When current information is taken into account, this new category is more similar to HF with preserved LVEF than reduced LVEF (AU)

Adaptación española de las guías europeas de 2016 sobre prevención de la enfermedad cardiovascular en la práctica clínica / Spanish adaptation of the 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice

Las VI Guías Europeas de Prevención Cardiovascular recomiendan combinar las estrategias poblacional y de alto riesgo, con los cambios de estilo de vida como piedra angular de la prevención, y proponen la función SCORE para cuantificar el riesgo cardiovascular. Esta guía hace más hincapié en las intervenciones específicas de las enfermedades y las condiciones propias de las mujeres, las personas jóvenes y las minorías étnicas. No se recomienda el cribado de aterosclerosis subclínica con técnicas de imagen no invasivas. La guía establece cuatro niveles de riesgo (muy alto, alto, moderado y bajo), con objetivos terapéuticos de control lipídico según el riesgo. La diabetes mellitus confiere un riesgo alto, excepto en sujetos con diabetes tipo 2 con menos de 10 años de evolución, sin otros factores de riesgo ni complicaciones, o con diabetes tipo 1 de corta evolución sin complicaciones. La decisión de iniciar el tratamiento farmacológico de la hipertensión arterial dependerá del nivel de presión arterial y del riesgo cardiovascular, teniendo en cuenta la lesión de órganos diana. Siguen sin recomendarse los fármacos antiplaquetarios en prevención primaria por el riesgo de sangrado. La baja adherencia al tratamiento exige simplificar el régimen terapéutico e identificar y combatir sus causas. La guía destaca que los profesionales de la salud pueden ejercer un papel importante en la promoción de intervenciones poblacionales y propone medidas eficaces, tanto a nivel individual como poblacional, para promover una dieta saludable, la práctica de actividad física, el abandono del tabaquismo y la protección contra el abuso de alcohol

The VI European Guidelines for Cardiovascular Prevention recommend combining population and high-risk strategies with lifestyle changes as a cornerstone of prevention, and propose the SCORE function to quantify cardiovascular risk. The guidelines highlight disease specific interventions, and conditions as women, young people and ethnic minorities. Screening for subclinical atherosclerosis with noninvasive imaging techniques is not recommended. The guidelines distinguish four risk levels (very high, high, moderate and low) with therapeutic objectives for lipid control according to risk. Diabetes mellitus confers a high risk, except for subjects with type 2 diabetes with less than <10 years of evolution, without other risk factors or complications, or type 1 diabetes of short evolution without complications. The decision to start pharmacological treatment of arterial hypertension will depend on the blood pressure level and the cardiovascular risk, taking into account the lesion of target organs. The guidelines don’t recommend antiplatelet drugs in primary prevention because of the increased bleeding risk. The low adherence to the medication requires simplified therapeutic regimes and to identify and combat its causes. The guidelines highlight the responsibility of health professionals to take an active role in advocating evidence-based interventions at the population level, and propose effective interventions, at individual and population level, to promote a healthy diet, the practice of physical activity, the cessation of smoking and the protection against alcohol abuse

Is heart failure with midrange ejection fraction similar to preserved ejection fraction? For. / La insuficiencia cardiaca con fracción de eyección en rango intermedio ¿es similar a la de fracción de eyección preservada? A favor.

Basing heart failure (HF) classification on the echocardiographic values of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has been useful in defining two sub-types of HF: HF with reduced LVEF and HF with preserved LVEF. A new category has recently been defined: HF with midrange LVEF (40-49%). When current information is taken into account, this new category is more similar to HF with preserved LVEF than reduced LVEF.

Adaptación española de las guías europeas de 2016 sobre prevención de la enfermedad cardiovascular en la práctica clínica / Spanish adaptation of the 2016 European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice

Las VI Guías Europeas de Prevención Cardiovascular recomiendan combinar las estrategias poblacional y de alto riesgo, con los cambios de estilo de vida como piedra angular de la prevención, y proponen la función SCORE para cuantificar el riesgo cardiovascular. Esta guía hace más hincapié en las intervenciones específicas de las enfermedades y las condiciones propias de las mujeres, las personas jóvenes y las minorías étnicas. No se recomienda el cribado de aterosclerosis subclínica con técnicas de imagen no invasivas. La guía establece cuatro niveles de riesgo (muy alto, alto, moderado y bajo), con objetivos terapéuticos de control lipídico según el riesgo. La diabetes mellitus confiere un riesgo alto, excepto en sujetos con diabetes tipo 2 con menos de diez años de evolución, sin otros factores de riesgo ni complicaciones, o con diabetes tipo 1 de corta evolución sin complicaciones. La decisión de iniciar el tratamiento farmacológico de la hipertensión arterial dependerá del nivel de presión arterial y del riesgo cardiovascular, teniendo en cuenta la lesión de órganos diana. Siguen sin recomendarse los fármacos antiplaquetarios en prevención primaria por el riesgo de sangrado. La baja adherencia al tratamiento exige simplificar el régimen terapéutico e identificar y combatir sus causas. La guía destaca que los profesionales de la salud pueden ejercer un papel importante en la promoción de intervenciones poblacionales y propone medidas eficaces, tanto a nivel individual como poblacional, para promover una dieta saludable, la práctica de actividad física, el abandono del tabaquismo y la protección contra el abuso de alcohol (AU)

The VI European Guidelines for Cardiovascular Prevention recommend combining population and high-risk strategies with lifestyle changes as a cornerstone of prevention, and propose the SCORE function to quantify cardiovascular risk. The guidelines highlight disease specific interventions, and conditions specific to women, young people and ethnic minorities. Screening for subclinical atherosclerosis with noninvasive imaging techniques is not recommended. The guidelines distinguish four risk levels (very high, high, moderate and low) with therapeutic objectives for lipid control according to risk. Diabetes mellitus confers a high risk, except for subjects with type 2 diabetes with less than ten years of evolution, with no other risk factors or complications, or type 1 diabetes of short evolution without complications. The decision to start pharmacological treatment of arterial hypertension will depend on the blood pressure level and cardiovascular risk, taking into account the lesion of target organs. The guidelines do not recommend antiplatelet drugs in primary prevention because of the increased risk of bleeding. The low adherence to the medication requires simplified therapeutic regimes and identifying and combating its causes. The guidelines highlight the responsibility of health professionals to play an active role in promoting evidence-based interventions at the population level, and propose effective interventions, both at individual and population level, to promote a healthy diet, the practice of physical activity, the cessation of smoking and the protection against alcohol abuse (AU)

Spanish adaptation of the 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. / Adaptación española de las guías europeas de 2016 sobre prevención de la enfermedad cardiovascular en la práctica clínica.

The VI European Guidelines for Cardiovascular Prevention recommend combining population and high-risk strategies with lifestyle changes as a cornerstone of prevention, and propose the SCORE function to quantify cardiovascular risk. The guidelines highlight disease specific interventions, and conditions as women, young people and ethnic minorities. Screening for subclinical atherosclerosis with noninvasive imaging techniques is not recommended. The guidelines distinguish four risk levels (very high, high, moderate and low) with therapeutic objectives for lipid control according to risk. Diabetes mellitus confers a high risk, except for subjects with type 2 diabetes with less than <10 years of evolution, without other risk factors or complications, or type 1 diabetes of short evolution without complications. The decision to start pharmacological treatment of arterial hypertension will depend on the blood pressure level and the cardiovascular risk, taking into account the lesion of target organs. The guidelines don't recommend antiplatelet drugs in primary prevention because of the increased bleeding risk. The low adherence to the medication requires simplified therapeutic regimes and to identify and combat its causes. The guidelines highlight the responsibility of health professionals to take an active role in advocating evidence-based interventions at the population level, and propose effective interventions, at individual and population level, to promote a healthy diet, the practice of physical activity, the cessation of smoking and the protection against alcohol abuse.

¿Van a cambiar los objetivos de control de la hipertensión arterial? / Should blood pressure goals be changed in hypertension treatment?

Las cifras más adecuadas de presión arterial han sido objeto de debate en las diferentes guías de manejo de la hipertensión arterial. Después de la publicación de las guías más recientes se han conocido los resultados del estudio SPRINT, que analiza las diferencias en morbimortalidad cardiovascular para diferentes objetivos de presión arterial sistólica. Dicho estudio muestra que con una presión arterial sistólica de 121 mmHg se reducen los episodios cardiovasculares más que con cifras < 140 mmHg. No obstante, el ensayo incluía un número bajo de pacientes diabéticos y con enfermedad cardiovascular, por lo que probablemente sus resultados no sean aplicables más que a un número limitado de hipertensos. En este artículo analizamos algunos de los datos disponibles respecto a este interesante aspecto

Which have to be the most suitable goal for blood pressure has been an object of a debate since the publication of different guidelines of managing of arterial hypertension. Later to the publication of the last guides, the results of the SPRINT study have been known. SPRINT analyzes the differences in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality of different systolic blood pressure goals. The above mentioned study shows that a reduction to 121 mmHg in SBP is better than a SBP < 140 mmHg. Nevertheless, this study has included a low number of diabetic patients and a limited number of patients with cardiovascular disease, therefore, probably, the results are not applicable than to a limited number of hypertensive patients. In this article we analyze some of the available information with regard to this interesting aspect

[Should blood pressure goals be changed in hypertension treatment?] / ¿Van a cambiar los objetivos de control de la hipertensión arterial?

Which have to be the most suitable goal for blood pressure has been an object of a debate since the publication of different guidelines of managing of arterial hypertension. Later to the publication of the last guides, the results of the SPRINT study have been known. SPRINT analyzes the differences in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality of different systolic blood pressure goals. The above mentioned study shows that a reduction to 121 mmHg in SBP is better than a SBP < 140 mmHg. Nevertheless, this study has included a low number of diabetic patients and a limited number of patients with cardiovascular disease, therefore, probably, the results are not applicable than to a limited number of hypertensive patients. In this article we analyze some of the available information with regard to this interesting aspect.

Comentarios del Comité Español Interdisciplinario de Prevención Cardiovascular (CEIPC) a las Guías Europeas de Prevención Cardiovascular 2012 / Statement of the Spanish Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular Prevention Committee (CEIPC for its Spanish acronym) on the 2012 European Cardiovascular Prevention Guidelines

Las guías europeas de prevención cardiovascular contemplan 2 sistemas de evaluación de la evidencia (SEC y GRADE) y recomiendan combinar las estrategias poblacional y de alto riesgo, interviniendo en todas las etapas de la vida, con la dieta como piedra angular de la prevención. La valoración del riesgo cardiovascular (RCV) incorpora los niveles de HDL y los factores psicosociales, una categoría de muy alto riesgo y el concepto edad-riesgo. Se recomienda el uso de métodos cognitivo-conductuales (entrevista motivadora, intervenciones psicológicas), aplicados por profesionales sanitarios, con la participación de familiares de los pacientes, para contrarrestar el estrés psicosocial y reducir el RCV mediante dietas saludables, entrenamiento físico, abandono del tabaco y cumplimiento terapéutico. También se requieren medidas de salud pública, como la prohibición de fumar en lugares públicos o eliminar los ácidos grasostrans de la cadena alimentaria. Otras novedades consisten en desestimar el tratamiento antiagregante en prevención primaria y la recomendación de mantener la presión arterial dentro del rango 130-139/80-85 mmHg en pacientes diabéticos o con RCV alto. Se destaca el bajo cumplimiento terapéutico observado, porque influye en el pronóstico de los pacientes y en los costes sanitarios. Para mejorar la prevención cardiovascular se precisa una verdadera alianza entre políticos, administraciones, asociaciones científicas y profesionales de la salud, fundaciones de salud, asociaciones de consumidores, pacientes y sus familias, que impulse la estrategia tanto poblacional como individual mediante el uso de toda la evidencia científica disponible, desde ensayos clínicos hasta estudios observacionales y modelos matemáticos para evaluar intervenciones a nivel poblacional, incluyendo análisis de coste-efectividad

Based on the two main frameworks for evaluating scientific evidence (SEC and GRADE) European cardiovascular prevention guidelines recommend interventions across all life stages using a combination of population-based and high-risk strategies with diet as the cornerstone of prevention. The evaluation of cardiovascular risk (CVR) incorporates HDL levels and psychosocial factors, a very high risk category, and the concept of age-risk. They also recommend cognitive-behavioural methods (e.g., motivational interviewing, psychological interventions) led by health professionals and with the participation of the patient's family, to counterbalance psychosocial stress and reduce CVR through the institution of positive habits such as a healthy diet, physical activity, smoking cessation, and adherence to treatment. Additionally, public health interventions - such as smoking ban in public areas or the elimination of trans fatty acids from the food chain - are also essential. Other innovations include abandoning antiplatelet therapy in primary prevention and the recommendation of maintaining blood pressure within the 130-139/80-85 mmHg range in diabetic patients and individuals with high CVR. Finally, due to the significant impact on patient progress and medical costs, special emphasis is given to the low therapeutic adherence levels observed. In sum, improving cardiovascular prevention requires a true partnership among the political class, public administrations, scientific and professional associations, health foundations, consumer associations, patients and their families. Such partnership would promote population-based and individual strategies by taking advantage of the broad spectrum of scientific evidence available, from clinical trials to observational studies and mathematical models to evaluate population-based interventions, including cost-effectiveness analyses

Statement of the Spanish Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular Prevention Committee (CEIPC for its Spanish acronym) on the 2012 European Cardiovascular Prevention Guidelines.

Based on the two main frameworks for evaluating scientific evidence (SEC and GRADE) European cardiovascular prevention guidelines recommend interventions across all life stages using a combination of population-based and high-risk strategies with diet as the cornerstone of prevention. The evaluation of cardiovascular risk (CVR) incorporates HDL levels and psychosocial factors, a very high risk category, and the concept of age-risk. They also recommend cognitive-behavioural methods (e.g., motivational interviewing, psychological interventions) led by health professionals and with the participation of the patient's family, to counterbalance psychosocial stress and reduce CVR through the institution of positive habits such as a healthy diet, physical activity, smoking cessation, and adherence to treatment. Additionally, public health interventions - such as smoking ban in public areas or the elimination of trans fatty acids from the food chain - are also essential. Other innovations include abandoning antiplatelet therapy in primary prevention and the recommendation of maintaining blood pressure within the 130-139/80-85 mmHg range in diabetic patients and individuals with high CVR. Finally, due to the significant impact on patient progress and medical costs, special emphasis is given to the low therapeutic adherence levels observed. In sum, improving cardiovascular prevention requires a true partnership among the political class, public administrations, scientific and professional associations, health foundations, consumer associations, patients and their families. Such partnership would promote population-based and individual strategies by taking advantage of the broad spectrum of scientific evidence available, from clinical trials to observational studies and mathematical models to evaluate population-based interventions, including cost-effectiveness analyses.

Posicionamiento del Comité Español Interdisciplinario de Prevención Cardiovascular y la Sociedad Española de Cardiología en el tratamiento de las dislipemias: divergencia entre las guías europea y estadounidense / Spanish Interdisciplinary Committee for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and the Spanish Society of Cardiology Position Statement on Dyslipidemia Management. Differences Between the European and American Guidelines

La publicación en EE. UU. de la guía de 2013 de American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association para el tratamiento del colesterol elevado ha tenido gran impacto por el cambio de paradigma que supone. El Comité Español Interdisciplinario de Prevención Cardiovascular y la Sociedad Española de Cardiología han revisado esa guía, en comparación con la vigente guía europea de prevención cardiovascular y de dislipemias. El aspecto más destacable de la guía estadounidense es el abandono de los objetivos de colesterol unido a lipoproteínas de baja densidad, de modo que proponen el tratamiento con estatinas en cuatro grupos de riesgo aumentado. En pacientes con enfermedad cardiovascular establecida, ambas guías conducen a una estrategia terapéutica similar (estatinas potentes, dosis altas). Sin embargo, en prevención primaria, la aplicación de la guía estadounidense supondría tratar con estatinas a un número de personas excesivo, particularmente de edades avanzadas. Abandonar la estrategia según objetivos de colesterol, fuertemente arraigada en la comunidad científica, podría tener un impacto negativo en la práctica clínica y crear cierta confusión e inseguridad entre los profesionales y quizá menos seguimiento y adherencia de los pacientes. Por todo ello, el presente documento reafirma las recomendaciones de la guía europea. Ambas guías tienen aspectos positivos pero, en general y mientras no se resuelvan las dudas planteadas, la guía europea, además de utilizar tablas basadas en la población autóctona, ofrece mensajes más apropiados para el entorno español y previene del posible riesgo de sobretratamiento con estatinas en prevención primaria (AU)

The publication of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines on the treatment of high blood cholesterol has had a strong impact due to the paradigm shift in its recommendations. The Spanish Interdisciplinary Committee for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and the Spanish Society of Cardiology reviewed this guideline and compared it with current European guidelines on cardiovascular prevention and dyslipidemia management. The most striking aspect of the American guideline is the elimination of the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol treat-to-target strategy and the adoption of a risk reduction strategy in 4 major statin benefit groups. In patients with established cardiovascular disease, both guidelines recommend a similar therapeutic strategy (high-dose potent statins). However, in primary prevention, the application of the American guidelines would substantially increase the number of persons, particularly older people, receiving statin therapy. The elimination of the cholesterol treat-to-target strategy, so strongly rooted in the scientific community, could have a negative impact on clinical practice, create a certain amount of confusion and uncertainty among professionals, and decrease follow-up and patient adherence. Thus, this article reaffirms the recommendations of the European guidelines. Although both guidelines have positive aspects, doubt remains regarding the concerns outlined above. In addition to using risk charts based on the native population, the messages of the European guideline are more appropriate to the Spanish setting and avoid the possible risk of overtreatment with statins in primary prevention (AU)

Therapeutic inertia in hypercholesterolaemia is associated with ischaemic events in primary care patients. A case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The frequency of therapeutic inertia (TI) is very high in the management of vascular risk factors, although its impact on the incidence of ischaemic events is not well-established. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between TI in the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia and the appearance of ischaemic events. METHODS: An observational, multicentre, case-control study was conducted in 70 primary care centres in Spain. Case subjects (n = 235) were high-risk hypercholesterolaemic patients (both genders, ≥ 18 years) who had had a first event in the 12 months prior to recruitment. They were matched with 235 controls (by vascular risk, age and gender). The observation period was 18 months prior to the onset of a first event (cases) or to date of recruitment (control subjects). RESULTS: The TI in the basal visit (an average of 7.8 months before the event) was slightly higher in cases than in controls (39.7% vs. 34.8%, NS). However, the accumulated TI was similar in both groups (70.7% for cases and 73.95% for controls, NS). The multivariate analysis, taking ischaemic events as the dependent variable, showed that the TI at baseline visit was significantly associated with the development of the event [OR 2.18 (95% CI 1.04-4.51), p < 0.05]. Other variables also associated with the ischaemic event were a family history of premature vascular disease [OR 3.38 (95% CI 1.35-8.49), p < 0.05] and uncontrolled hypertension [OR 2.35 (95% CI 1.02-5.43), p < 0.05]. CONCLUSION: The TI in high-risk hypercholesterolaemic patients in primary prevention in Spanish primary care centres doubled the risk of an ischaemic event in the short term.

Comentarios del Comité Español Interdisciplinario de Prevención Cardiovascular (CEIPC) a las Guías Europeas de Prevención Cardiovascular 2012 / Statement of the Spanish Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular Prevention Committee (CEIPC for its Spanish acronym) on the 2012 European Cardiovascular Prevention Guidelines

Las guías europeas de prevención cardiovascular contemplan 2 sistemas de evaluación de la evidencia (SEC y GRADE) y recomiendan combinar las estrategias poblacional y de alto riesgo, interviniendo en todas las etapas de la vida, con la dieta como piedra angular de la prevención. La valoración del riesgo cardiovascular (RCV) incorpora los niveles de HDL y los factores psicosociales, una categoría de muy alto riesgo y el concepto edad-riesgo. Se recomienda el uso de métodos cognitivo-conductuales (entrevista motivadora, intervenciones psicológicas), aplicados por profesionales sanitarios, con la participación de familiares de los pacientes, para contrarrestar el estrés psicosocial y reducir el RCV mediante dietas saludables, entrenamiento físico, abandono del tabaco y cumplimiento terapéutico. También se requieren medidas de salud pública, como la prohibición de fumar en lugares públicos o eliminar los ácidos grasos trans de la cadena alimentaria. Otras novedades consisten en desestimar el tratamiento antiagregante en prevención primaria y la recomendación de mantener la presión arterial dentro del rango 130-139/80-85 mmHg en pacientes diabéticos o con RCV alto. Se destaca el bajo cumplimiento terapéutico observado, porque influye en el pronóstico de los pacientes y en los costes sanitarios. Para mejorar la prevención cardiovascular se precisa una verdadera alianza entre políticos, administraciones, asociaciones científicas y profesionales de la salud, fundaciones de salud, asociaciones de consumidores, pacientes y sus familias, que impulse la estrategia tanto poblacional como individual mediante el uso de toda la evidencia científica disponible, desde ensayos clínicos hasta estudios observacionales y modelos matemáticos para evaluar intervenciones a nivel poblacional, incluyendo análisis de coste-efectividad (AU)

Based on the two main frameworks for evaluating scientific evidence (SEC and GRADE) European cardiovascular prevention guidelines recommend interventions across all life stages using a combination of population-based and high-risk strategies with diet as the cornerstone of prevention. The evaluation of cardiovascular risk (CVR) incorporates HDL levels and psychosocial factors, a very high risk category, and the concept of age-risk. They also recommend cognitive-behavioural methods (e.g., motivational interviewing, psychological interventions) led by health professionals and with the participation of the patient's family, to counterbalance psychosocial stress and reduce CVR through the institution of positive habits such as a healthy diet, physical activity, smoking cessation, and adherence to treatment. Additionally, public health interventions - such as smoking ban in public areas or the elimination of trans fatty acids from the food chain - are also essential. Other innovations include abandoning antiplatelet therapy in primary prevention and the recommendation of maintaining blood pressure within the 130-139/80-85mmHg range in diabetic patients and individuals with high CVR. Finally, due to the significant impact on patient progress and medical costs, special emphasis is given to the low therapeutic adherence levels observed. In sum, improving cardiovascular prevention requires a true partnership among the political class, public administrations, scientific and professional associations, health foundations, consumer associations, patients and their families. Such partnership would promote population-based and individual strategies by taking advantage of the broad spectrum of scientific evidence available, from clinical trials to observational studies and mathematical models to evaluate population-based interventions, including cost-effectiveness analyses

Supervivencia a largo plazo del ictus isquémico / Long-term survival of ischemic stroke

Objetivo. El ictus isquémico es una enfermedad vascular grave, cuyo pronóstico a largo plazo no conocemos en toda su dimensión. Hemos estudiado la supervivencia a largo plazo y sus factores pronósticos tras un primer episodio de ictus agudo de origen isquémico (cardioembólico y aterotrombótico). Pacientes y métodos. Estudio de cohortes retrospectivo de pacientes que han requerido ingreso por un primer episodio de ictus isquémico. El ictus se clasificó en aterotrombótico, cardioembólico, lacunar e indeterminado. Los enfermos fueron seguidos durante 10 años. Resultados. Se incluyeron 415 pacientes (varones: 60%), con una edad media de 68,4 años. La media de seguimiento fue de 66 meses (IC del 95%: 24-108 meses). La supervivencia global a los 10 años fue del 55,4% (54,9-55,9) (aterotrombótico, 57,5% vs cardioembólico, 43,7%; p=0,002). En el análisis multivariante las variables relacionadas con la mortalidad fueron la mayor edad, presencia de insuficiencia renal crónica, dislipemia, antecedentes de insuficiencia cardiaca, fibrilación auricular, presentación con hemiplejía, y los signos de isquemia aguda y de edema perilesional en el TAC realizado en el ingreso hospitalario. Se asociaron a un mejor pronóstico la afectación del territorio de la arteria cerebral media derecha y el tratamiento con estatinas. Conclusiones. La supervivencia tras un ictus isquémico a los 10 años es algo superior al 40%, y tiene mejor pronóstico el ictus aterotrombótico que el cardioembólico(AU)

Objective. Ischemic stroke is a serious vascular disease whose long term prognosis in all of its dimensions is not known. We have studied the long-term survival and its predictors after a first episode of acute ischemic stroke (atherothrombotic and cardioembolic). Patients and methods. A retrospective cohort study was made of patients with a first episode of ischemic stroke. The ictus was classified into atherothrombotic, cardioembolic, lacunar and undetermined. Patients were followed up for 10 years. Results. A total of 415 cases (60% men) with mean age of 68.4 years, were included. Mean follow-up was 66 months (95% CI: 24-108 months). Overall survival at 10 years was 55.4% (54.9-55.9) (atherothrombotic, 57.7% vs cardioembolic, 43.7%, P=.002). In the multivariate analysis, variables related to mortality in acute ischemic stroke were age, chronic renal failure, dyslipidemia, history of heart failure, atrial fibrillation (AF), presenting as hemiplegia, signs of acute ischemia and perilesional edema in the brain scan on hospital admission. Involvement of the territory of right middle cerebral artery and treatment with statins were associated to a better prognosis. Conclusions. Survival of patients after ischemic stroke at ten year is over 40%, and atherothrombotic stroke as a better prognosis than cardioembolic one(AU)

[Long-term survival of ischemic stroke]. / Supervivencia a largo plazo del ictus isquémico.

OBJECTIVE: Ischemic stroke is a serious vascular disease whose long term prognosis in all of its dimensions is not known. We have studied the long-term survival and its predictors after a first episode of acute ischemic stroke (atherothrombotic and cardioembolic). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was made of patients with a first episode of ischemic stroke. The ictus was classified into atherothrombotic, cardioembolic, lacunar and undetermined. Patients were followed up for 10 years. RESULTS: A total of 415 cases (60% men) with mean age of 68.4 years, were included. Mean follow-up was 66 months (95% CI: 24-108 months). Overall survival at 10 years was 55.4% (54.9-55.9) (atherothrombotic, 57.7% vs cardioembolic, 43.7%, P=.002). In the multivariate analysis, variables related to mortality in acute ischemic stroke were age, chronic renal failure, dyslipidemia, history of heart failure, atrial fibrillation (AF), presenting as hemiplegia, signs of acute ischemia and perilesional edema in the brain scan on hospital admission. Involvement of the territory of right middle cerebral artery and treatment with statins were associated to a better prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Survival of patients after ischemic stroke at ten year is over 40%, and atherothrombotic stroke as a better prognosis than cardioembolic one.

2010: ¿Qué ha habido de nuevo en riesgo vascular? / 2010. What novelties are there in vascular risk?

Este artículo recoge las novedades que se han producido en riesgo vascular en el año 2010. Resume cinco ponencias, en el orden que se expusieron, en la reunión anual del grupo de trabajo de riesgo vascular de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna (Valencia, 5 y 6 mayo 2010): hipertensión arterial antitrombosis, lípidos, diabetes mellitus y estratificación del riesgo vascular. Los autores han revisado en profundidad las investigaciones más relevantes publicadas en 2010 con algunos datos del año 2011(AU)

This paper gathers the news concerning vascular risk in 2010. It summarizes five lectures, according to the order of presentation, at the annual meeting of the vascular risk working group of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI, Valencia 5th and 6th May 2011): arterial hypertension, antithrombosis, lipid disorders, diabetes mellitus and vascular risk stratification. The authors have made a depth revision of the more relevant research been published in 2010 with some data of 2011(AU)

[2010. What novelties are there in vascular risk?]. / 2010: ¿Qué ha habido de nuevo en riesgo vascular?

This paper gathers the news concerning vascular risk in 2010. It summarizes five lectures, according to the order of presentation, at the annual meeting of the vascular risk working group of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI, Valencia 5(th) and 6(th) May 2011): arterial hypertension, antithrombosis, lipid disorders, diabetes mellitus and vascular risk stratification. The authors have made a depth revision of the more relevant research been published in 2010 with some data of 2011.

Monitorización ambulatoria de la presión arterial e insuficiencia cardiaca / Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and heart failure

La hipertensión arterial (HTA) es una de las principales causas de la insuficiencia cardiaca (IC) y un buen control de la presión arterial es fundamental en la prevención y manejo de la IC. Trabajos recientes, basados en cifras de presión arterial (PA) medidas en la consulta han mostrado una correlación significativa entre una PA más baja y un peor pronóstico de la IC. Sin embargo, una utilización más habitual de la monitorización ambulatoria de la presión arterial(MAPA) nos ha mostrado la existencia de alteraciones en diferentes componentes de la PA, que constituyen entidades como la HTA nocturna o la HTA enmascarada, que se ha demostrado que implican un peor pronóstico de la enfermedad cardiovascular. Sin embargo, la información de la que disponemos de datos de la MAPA en pacientes con IC es escasa, y los datos de los que disponemos provienen de estudios realizados en un número de pacientes muy limitado. Además, la forma más frecuente de IC en el paciente hipertenso es la IC por disfunción diastólica, y estos pacientes están muy poco representados en los estudios disponibles. Todo ello nos plantea preguntas como si existen en estas fases precoces de la IC alteraciones en la MAPA, o si existen alteraciones de los patrones circadianos de la PA en pacientes con IC avanzada, o si tienen estas alteraciones en los patrones de la MAPA valor pronóstico, o si el tratamiento de la IC tiene algún efecto sobre las características de la MAPA. En este artículo intentamos responder a estas preguntas través de la escasa evidencia disponible (AU)

High blood pressure is one of the main causes of heart failure (HF) and good control of blood pressure is essential to the prevention and management of HF. Recent works, based on blood pressure levels measured in the medical office, have shown a significant correlation between lower BP and worse diagnosis of HF. However, a more common use of the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) demonstrates the existence of alterations in different components of the blood pressure. These make up entities such as nocturnal HBP or masked hypertension, which have been shown to imply worse prognosis of the cardiovascular disease. However, the information we have on the ABPM in patients with HF is scarce and the data we do have come from studies conducted in a very limited number of patients. Furthermore, the most frequent form of HF in the hypertense patient is HF due to diastolic dysfunction and these patients represent a very small part of the studies available. All this gives rise to questions about whether there may be alterations in the ABPM in these early phases of HF or if there are alterations of the circadian patterns of BP in patients with advanced HF, or whether these alterations in the ABPM patients have prognostic value or if the treatment of the HF has any effect on the characteristics of the ABPM. In this article, we have aimed to answer these questions using the limited evidence available (AU)

Influence of admission blood pressure on mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationship between admission blood pressure (BP) and prognosis in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND: The relationship between BP admission blood pressure and outcomes in decompensated HF is controversial. It has been suggested that this presentation may be a specific disorder, but their mechanisms and clinical relationships are poorly defined. METHODS: We evaluated the association between initial BP (systolic, diastolic and mean BP) with readmission and mortality, as well as potential interactions with age, clinical characteristics, renal function, left ventricular dysfunction, comorbidities and treatment. By using Cox regression models the association between each outcome and BP was tested. RESULTS: A total of 581 patients (77.5-years-old, range 51-100) were included. At admission, mean BP in quartiles was 77.09 mm Hg (53.3-85.0) (Q1); 91.46 mm Hg (85.0-96.7) (Q2); 103.41 mm Hg (96.7-109.9) (Q3) and 124.79 mm Hg (109.9-209.0) (Q4). Median duration of follow-up was 8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.2-11.1]. Mortality was 15.5% (Q1), 9.2% (Q2), 12.6% (Q3) and 7.3% (Q4). Interquartile hazard ratio (95% CIs) for mortality was 0.40 (0.19-0.85) P=0.017. Body mass index (BMI) was higher in Q4 29.59 k/m2 than in Q1 28.25 k/m2 (P=0.018). There were no differences in age, clinical antecedents, renal function, comorbidities or severity of HF between groups. CONCLUSION: Higher mean BP at admission is associated with significantly lower mortality during follow-up, in patients hospitalized for HF. With the exception of BMI, positively correlated with blood pressure, this relationship is independent of other clinical factors and medications.